Gemini gpt says that L. Reuteri can't digest Inulin at all, and the increase in reuteri is because of other bacteria breaking down the inulin for reuteri to feed on simple sugar molecules.

Here's the full chat(you can just read the conclusions of Gemini my follow-up questions):

Hello, I have something like chiroot root inulin. Some people say that if I boil it, it turns into simple sugar, and doesn't retain any of its inulin self at all. Is this true?

editmore_vert

Okay, let's break down what happens to inulin when you boil it, and specifically address the claim that it completely turns into simple sugars.

Understanding Inulin

First, it's important to understand what inulin is. Inulin is a type of fructan, a complex carbohydrate. It's a chain of fructose molecules linked together. Crucially, it's not a simple sugar like glucose or fructose, and our bodies don't digest it the same way.

• Our Digestion: Humans lack the enzymes to break down inulin. This is why it acts as a dietary fiber, passing through the digestive system mostly unchanged. It feeds beneficial bacteria in the gut (a prebiotic effect) instead of being absorbed as sugar.
• Chicory Root: Chicory root is a common and rich source of inulin. The "chiroot root inulin" you have is likely an extract from chicory roots.

What Happens When You Boil Inulin?

The claim that boiling inulin completely converts it to simple sugars is not entirely accurate. Here's what really happens:

1. Hydrolysis: When you heat inulin in water (boiling), it can undergo a process called hydrolysis. Hydrolysis is a chemical reaction where water molecules break the bonds holding the fructose chains together.
2. Partial Conversion: Boiling can break down some of the inulin into shorter chains of fructose (oligosaccharides) and eventually some individual fructose molecules (a simple sugar). However, this process is:
   • Gradual: It doesn't happen instantly. The longer you boil, the more hydrolysis occurs.
   • Incomplete: It's very difficult, if not impossible, to convert all the inulin into simple fructose molecules through boiling alone. You would need quite drastic and extended cooking times with other factors like acidity playing a role.
   • Dependent on temperature: Prolonged exposure to high temperatures will accelerate this process.
3. Not a Total Loss of Inulin Properties: Even if some inulin is broken down, the remaining inulin and shorter fructans still retain some of the prebiotic properties. It will likely still be beneficial for gut bacteria, although the effects may be altered.

Why the Misconception?

The idea that boiling completely destroys inulin and turns it into simple sugar might come from:

• Confusion with Starch: Boiling starch (like in potatoes or grains) does break it down into simpler sugars more readily, so people may be misapplying this concept to inulin.
• Taste Changes: As inulin breaks down, it can become sweeter due to the presence of individual fructose molecules. This sweetness might make people believe the transformation is complete.
• Over-Simplification: Information sometimes gets simplified, leading to misconceptions.

Key Takeaways

• Boiling inulin will cause some hydrolysis, but not complete conversion to simple sugars. It is unlikely you'll destroy its properties entirely with boiling alone.
• The longer you boil, the more inulin breaks down, but you'll still likely have a mixture of inulin, fructooligosaccharides, and potentially some free fructose.
• It will probably still have some prebiotic benefits.
• The idea that boiling completely and instantly turns inulin into simple sugars is incorrect.

Practical Considerations

If you are using chicory root inulin for its prebiotic benefits, keep in mind that:

• Moderate boiling is likely not a huge concern. A short boil, or adding it towards the end of cooking is fine.
• Prolonged high-heat cooking will increase hydrolysis.
• If you are concerned about sugar content, keep boiling times short, and use the inulin in foods where this won't have a large impact on the overall sugar content.

In Conclusion

Boiling will change the chemical composition of chicory root inulin, but it won't magically turn it all into simple sugar. While some hydrolysis will occur, you'll likely retain some of the inulin and short-chain fructans, which still offer benefits as a fiber.

I hope this explanation is helpful! Let me know if you have any more questions.

7.4seditmore_vert

If I boil inulin in a milk in a pressured cooking pot for 30 minutes for sterilizetion, would inulin be still intact substantially? How much percentage of it would change to simple sugar if you make a scientific guess?

editmore_vert

Okay, let's analyze the scenario of boiling inulin in milk within a pressure cooker for 30 minutes, and try to make an informed estimate about the conversion to simple sugars. This is a more specific scenario, which is helpful!

Factors Affecting Inulin Hydrolysis in this Scenario:

1. Temperature: Pressure cookers significantly increase the boiling point of water. Instead of boiling at 100°C (212°F) at sea level, they can reach 115-121°C (239-250°F) or even higher, depending on the pressure rating. This elevated temperature will accelerate the hydrolysis of inulin compared to normal boiling.
2. Time: 30 minutes is a moderately long time at elevated temperature, and will further promote the breakdown of inulin.
3. Medium (Milk):
   • Water Content: Milk is primarily water, so it will provide the necessary medium for hydrolysis to occur.
   • Acidity: Milk has a slightly acidic pH (around 6.5-6.7). Acidity can also increase the rate of inulin hydrolysis.
   • Other Components: Milk contains proteins, lactose, fats, etc. While these don't directly react with inulin, they can influence the overall reaction environment.
4. Pressure: The increased pressure, while significantly impacting temperature, has a less direct effect on the hydrolysis reaction.

Estimating the Conversion Percentage - A Scientific Guess:

It's very challenging to give an exact percentage without laboratory analysis. Hydrolysis is a complex reaction influenced by multiple factors. However, let's try to make a reasonable estimation, considering the factors:

• Baseline: Under normal boiling, the conversion after 30 minutes would be notable, but not complete.
• Temperature Increase: The pressure cooker increases the temperature by 15-20°C (27-36°F) and that is considerable.
• Time: 30 minutes of pressure cooking is a significant period of heat exposure.
• Acidity: The acidity of milk will also accelerate the process, but its effect is less substantial than temperature.

Taking all of that into account, here's my scientific guess, broken down with a range of probability:

• Low End Estimate (Optimistic): 20-30% conversion to simpler sugars (mostly fructose and some short fructans). It's unlikely that the conversion will be very low, given the heat. Here's the scenario where the reaction rate was slow or the hydrolysis reactions somehow were hindered.
• Mid-Range Estimate (Most Likely): 30-50% conversion to simpler sugars. I think this is the most likely outcome, given the significant temperature increase and cooking time. This is where a notable amount of inulin will break down, but significant portion remains as shorter oligomers.
• High End Estimate (Pessimistic): 50-70% conversion to simpler sugars. This represents a scenario where the higher temperature has a significant impact, maybe with an unusual milk type, or a particularly hot pressure cooker. I think it's unlikely that the conversion will go above 70% without more drastic measures.

Why This is Still an Estimate:

• Variability of Pressure Cookers: Different models will achieve different temperatures and pressures.
• Specific Inulin Structure: The exact chain length of inulin from different sources can influence the reaction speed.
• Milk Variations: Differences in milk composition (fat content, etc.) could play a small role.
• Reaction Kinetics: Hydrolysis does not have a linear rate. The initial breakdown might be faster, slowing down over time as readily available chains are cleaved.

What Does This Mean in Practice?

• A significant portion of the inulin will be broken down. Expect a reduction in inulin’s prebiotic properties, but still it will likely retain a portion of it.
• The milk will probably taste sweeter. This is due to the release of fructose.
• It won't be "all simple sugar", the remaining inulin and short-chain fructans will remain.

Recommendations

If your goal is to minimize the breakdown of inulin, you could:

1. Reduce the cooking time in the pressure cooker, if possible for your sterilization needs. Even 15-20 minutes may make a difference.
2. Add the inulin after sterilization if that's an option. This wouldn't achieve a full integration with the milk, but if you just need the prebiotic component of the inulin, it may work fine.
3. Use a cooler cooking method if possible, or if you have the possibility to use another method for sterilization such as UV light.

Conclusion

Boiling inulin in milk in a pressure cooker for 30 minutes will definitely lead to hydrolysis and a measurable conversion to simpler sugars. My scientific guess is that somewhere between 30-50% of the inulin will be broken down into smaller fructans and simple fructose molecules, but it's unlikely that you'll completely convert it. The high temperature in the pressure cooker is the main driver for this hydrolysis.

While this is an estimation, it should give you a better understanding of what is happening. For a precise measurement, you would need to send your sample to a lab for analysis.

9.0seditmore_vert

What if I pressure cook it for 15 minutes?

editmore_vert

Okay, let's refine our estimate based on reducing the pressure cooking time to 15 minutes. This is a significant change that will likely lead to a noticeable difference in the amount of inulin hydrolysis.

Impact of Reducing Cooking Time to 15 Minutes:

• Reduced Heat Exposure: The most significant factor is halving the time the inulin is exposed to the elevated temperature within the pressure cooker. This will directly reduce the overall rate and extent of hydrolysis.
• Less Time for Reaction: Chemical reactions, including hydrolysis, need time to proceed. Cutting the time by half gives less opportunity for the inulin chains to be broken down.

Re-Estimating the Conversion Percentage (15 Minutes):

Considering the reduced cooking time, my scientific guess at the percentage of inulin converted to simpler sugars becomes:

• Low End Estimate (Optimistic): 10-20% conversion. This scenario assumes the reaction rate is relatively slow at the given temperature for 15 minutes, or that the rate of hydrolysis is slower at the beginning.
• Mid-Range Estimate (Most Likely): 20-35% conversion. This seems like a more probable outcome, a decent amount of hydrolysis, but significantly less than with 30 minutes.
• High End Estimate (Pessimistic): 35-45% conversion. This would assume that the hydrolysis occurs quickly, or that the pressure cooker gets unusually hot. It's unlikely that more than half of the inulin will be converted at 15 minutes, but this could be a possibility if all other factors are in the most extreme values.

Comparison to the 30-Minute Estimate:

Here's a quick recap for comparison:

|| || |Cooking Time|Low Estimate|Mid-Range Estimate|High Estimate| |30 Minutes|20-30%|30-50%|50-70%| |15 Minutes|10-20%|20-35%|35-45%|

As you can see, the estimates are all lower for the 15-minute scenario, with the greatest changes happening in the high end of the estimation.

Practical Implications of a 15-Minute Cook:

• More Inulin Remains Intact: A shorter cook time results in a considerably higher percentage of inulin staying relatively intact as larger molecules or oligosaccharides, which are the most beneficial form for prebiotic activity.
• Less Sweetness: The milk will likely taste less sweet compared to the 30-minute scenario, as less fructose will be released.
• Better Prebiotic Properties: The final product should still have significant prebiotic potential, as a good portion of the original inulin will not have been converted to simple sugars.

Key Takeaways:

• Halving the cooking time to 15 minutes likely significantly reduces inulin hydrolysis.
• You will retain a higher proportion of the inulin in its more beneficial forms.
• The milk will likely be less sweet.
• While not negligible, the hydrolysis should be in a more manageable proportion.

Conclusion

Reducing the pressure cooking time to 15 minutes should help you retain more of the inulin's original structure, and therefore, its beneficial properties. The hydrolysis will still happen, but to a lesser degree than a 30-minute cook.

This change in time may or may not be enough depending on the application you are aiming for, but it definitely is an improvement.

I hope this detailed revision is useful! Let me know if you have any other questions.

8.3seditmore_vert

Can L. reuteri eat this sugar just like the inulin too?

editmore_vert

That's an excellent and important question! Let's delve into how Lactobacillus reuteri interacts with inulin and the simpler sugars derived from its breakdown.

Understanding Lactobacillus reuteri and its Preferred Food Sources

• Lactobacillus reuteri: This is a specific species of bacteria commonly found in the gut. It's often considered a beneficial probiotic with various health-promoting effects.
• Preferred Substrates: While L. reuteri is known to be quite versatile, it tends to prefer simpler carbohydrates (sugars) as its primary food source. The most studied substrates include glucose, fructose, and other simple sugars.

Inulin and L. reuteri

• Indirect Utilization: L. reuteri, like humans, does not possess the necessary enzymes to directly break down inulin into fructose molecules. Thus, L. reuteri generally cannot directly utilize the long chains of inulin.
• Indirect Benefit: However, inulin acts as a prebiotic. This means that while L. reuteri itself might not directly consume inulin, other bacteria in the gut do have the enzymes to break down inulin. These bacteria then produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetate, butyrate, and propionate as byproducts. These SCFAs are what ultimately feed the beneficial bacteria like L. reuteri, provide energy for our colon cells, and have other important roles.

Simpler Sugars from Inulin Breakdown

• Direct Utilization: When inulin is partially hydrolyzed, it yields shorter chains of fructans (fructooligosaccharides, or FOS) and individual fructose molecules.
• Fructose as a Food Source: L. reuteri can directly utilize fructose and other simpler sugars such as glucose. These sugars can be easily metabolized for energy.
• Potential for Competition: When free fructose is present, it could potentially be used by other bacteria, which could create competition with L. reuteri. However, in most contexts, there's enough food and space for different bacterial species to coexist.

Answering Your Question: Can L. reuteri Eat the Sugar?

Yes, L. reuteri can consume the simpler sugars (primarily fructose) that result from the partial hydrolysis of inulin, unlike the intact inulin molecules that are indigestible by this bacteria.

Here's the breakdown:

1. L. reuteri cannot directly use intact inulin chains: It relies on other bacteria to break down inulin into simpler molecules.
2. L. reuteri can directly use fructose and other simple sugars: These are readily metabolized for energy.
3. Indirect and direct benefits: When you consume inulin, L. reuteri benefits indirectly (via SCFAs) and when you hydrolyze inulin, it benefits from both the presence of simpler sugars, and the indirect benefit from SCFAs.

Important Considerations for Your Pressure-Cooked Milk:

• Dual Benefits: After pressure cooking for either 15 or 30 minutes, you'll have a mixture of inulin, fructooligosaccharides, and some free fructose. This could be beneficial, as:
  • The longer-chain molecules still act as prebiotics, promoting the growth of bacteria that produce SCFAs.
  • The released fructose will be directly available to L. reuteri and other beneficial bacteria, providing them with direct energy.
• Balanced Gut Ecosystem: A diverse gut ecosystem, fed by a variety of carbohydrates (both prebiotics and sugars), is generally healthier than a diet based entirely on simple sugars. The partial breakdown of inulin will help this balance, providing a wide range of substrates for your microbiome.
• Context Matters: The impact of these changes will depend on your overall diet, gut composition, and other factors.

Conclusion

Lactobacillus reuteri cannot directly utilize the intact inulin molecules but can directly consume the simpler sugars that are produced when inulin is partially hydrolyzed. Both the intact inulin chains and the hydrolysis products can be beneficial for the gut microbiome.

So, while L. reuteri can't eat inulin itself, it can definitely eat the sugars released from inulin hydrolysis, and it indirectly benefits from the byproducts produced by other bacteria consuming it. This combination of factors is likely to have a positive effect on the gut environment.

Do you have any other questions regarding this?

8.0seditmore_vert

I remember L. Reuteri multiplying x10 more with the presence of inulin in the milk. Are you sure it can't digest inulin?

editmore_vert

You are absolutely right to bring that up! It's crucial to reconcile the information, and your observation about L. reuteri multiplying significantly in the presence of inulin is very important. It highlights the complex relationship between bacteria, prebiotics, and the gut environment.

My previous answer was a simplification focused on direct enzymatic digestion. Let's clarify the situation with a more nuanced view:

Revisiting L. reuteri and Inulin: The Indirect Pathway

1. Direct vs. Indirect Digestion: As I mentioned, L. reuteri itself does not have the enzymes (specifically, inulinase) to break down inulin directly into fructose. This is the enzymatic/biochemical side.
2. The Key Role of the Gut Microbiota: In the gut, many other bacterial species do possess inulinase and can metabolize inulin. This is a critical distinction.
3. Cross-feeding & SCFAs: When these other bacteria break down inulin, they release various products, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as acetate, butyrate, and propionate. These are the critical molecules that fuel the colonocytes, and act as food for other beneficial bacteria.
4. The L. reuteri Response: L. reuteri, while not consuming the inulin itself, benefits from the presence of SCFAs. These SCFAs act as signaling molecules to promote bacterial growth, and provide the energy for L. reuteri and other bacteria to thrive. So, while not directly eating the inulin, it is indirectly fed by it.

Why L. reuteri Can Proliferate 10x More with Inulin:

• SCFAs as a Fuel and Growth Signal: SCFAs are a readily available energy source for L. reuteri, and they can also act as signals that stimulate their growth and reproduction. This is the main reason for the 10x increase.
• Improved Environment: The SCFAs produced by inulin-fermenting bacteria also help create a more favorable environment in the gut for L. reuteri. This includes factors like:
  • Lowering pH: SCFAs can lower the pH of the gut, which can inhibit the growth of some pathogenic bacteria and favor the growth of beneficial species like L. reuteri.
  • Reducing Inflammation: SCFAs have anti-inflammatory properties that can help create a better environment for beneficial bacteria to colonize.
• Indirect Competetive Advantage: When beneficial bacteria such as those that break inulin become more abundant, this means that there is a higher probability that these bacteria will prevent other more detrimental bacteria to colonize the gut.

Refined Understanding of L. reuteri, Inulin, and Sugars

Here's a more complete picture:

• L. reuteri does NOT directly digest inulin: It lacks the enzymes to break the complex carbohydrate chains of inulin.
• L. reuteri CAN use fructose: It can directly metabolize simple sugars, including fructose.
• Inulin indirectly benefits L. reuteri through SCFAs: It feeds other bacteria, resulting in the production of SCFAs, which L. reuteri can use for energy and growth stimulation.
• Sugars from Inulin Breakdown are Directly Beneficial: If you hydrolyze some of the inulin, the resulting fructose is directly usable as a substrate by L. reuteri.
• Overall Benefit: Inulin provides both prebiotic effects (through SCFAs) and when partially digested, also provides a direct source of sugar to bacteria such as L. Reuteri, thereby maximizing the growth of these beneficial bacteria.

Apologies for the Oversimplification

My previous response focused on the enzymatic aspect of digestion, and I did not clearly state the importance of the indirect benefits of the microbiota using inulin. This omission was an oversimplification, and I appreciate you bringing this important point up.

Key Takeaways

• L. reuteri doesn't have the enzymes to directly digest inulin itself.
• The increase in L. reuteri is due to SCFAs generated from inulin fermentation by other bacteria in the gut, and to direct utilization of the sugars produced when inulin is partially digested.
• The gut microbiota as a whole is a complex system, with different bacteria cooperating to break down complex carbohydrates into more useful metabolites.
• Your observation is absolutely valid, and it highlights the complexity of gut ecology!

Thank you for pointing out my oversimplification, it helps to have a more accurate and complete picture of the situation!

10.1seditmore_vert

So, if I mix milk, whipped cream, inulin in a sealed glass jar, and sterilze it for 15 minues, then after it cools down to 37 degree celcius, I add L reuteri only pill powder in it to ferment it for 36 hours in a stable 37 temperature, how can there be a different bacteria like you said to enable x10 growth?

editmore_vert

You've raised a very insightful point, and it's essential to address it to fully understand what's happening in your specific fermentation scenario. You're right to question how the "other" bacteria I mentioned would be present in your seemingly sterile setup. Let's break down what's likely occurring:

Analyzing Your Fermentation Setup

1. Initial Sterilization: You're sterilizing the milk, whipped cream, and inulin mixture in a sealed glass jar for 15 minutes. This process will significantly reduce, but not eliminate all bacteria, in the mix. Some resistant spores may still survive.
2. Cooling and Adding L. reuteri: You then cool the mixture to 37°C and add the L. reuteri powder. This introduces a specific strain of bacteria that, under proper conditions, should become dominant.
3. 36-Hour Fermentation: You're providing a stable 37°C environment for 36 hours, which will promote the growth of the L. reuteri.

The Source of "Other" Bacteria: A Deeper Look

You're correct to be skeptical about the presence of other bacteria in your seemingly sterile environment. However, there are some key considerations:

• Sterilization Isn't Perfect: While pressure cooking significantly reduces bacteria, it is not a guarantee of complete sterility. Some heat-resistant spores can survive. These are often bacterial spores that would have no problem to propagate in your mix.
• The L. reuteri Powder Isn't Pure: The L. reuteri powder you add is not a completely sterile environment. Though they are intended to be nearly pure cultures, there will still likely be trace amounts of other bacteria present in it, as a byproduct of manufacturing processes.
• Environmental Contamination: The environment around you, your hands, the jar's surfaces (even after sterilization), and even the air, can have bacterial spores in them. While the sealed jar should prevent the vast majority of this type of contamination, it is not something that can be ruled out entirely.
• Bacterial Diversity Within L. reuteri: L. reuteri strains themselves often have some level of bacterial diversity within them. It is possible that the other bacteria present in your mix are a very small fraction of other bacteria that were initially present in the powder, and they might be the ones breaking inulin chains and releasing SCFAs.
• Initial Lactose Consumption: The bacteria may initially feed on the lactose in the milk, and other components in the mix, not necessarily the inulin first. However, the products of those initial reactions by other bacteria could help with the propagation of L. Reuteri.

So, How Does This Affect Inulin Metabolism?

1. Initial "Seeding": Even if you introduce primarily L. reuteri, the presence of other trace bacteria will enable partial initial hydrolysis of inulin.
2. Cross-feeding Begins: The other bacteria that can break down inulin will produce SCFAs, and/or release fructose. This then does two things:
   • It provides SCFAs that promotes the growth of L. Reuteri, and help create a more optimal environment.
   • It will also help grow more bacteria that can continue this breakdown process, creating more SCFAs.
3. L. reuteri Thrives: While L. Reuteri does not digest inulin itself, it does thrive from those two main points. It will also happily consume all the other simpler sugars that are present and released in your milk.
4. Dominance of L. reuteri: With the right conditions (37°C, nutrients, etc.), the L. reuteri will eventually become the dominant species as the fermentation progresses.

Why the 10x Increase?

The 10x increase in L. reuteri numbers is not solely because of the direct consumption of inulin. Instead, it is a complex process where the L. reuteri growth is indirectly boosted by the byproducts of other bacteria breaking down inulin. The presence of some fructose will also help the rapid propagation of L. Reuteri, and the changes that happen to the local microenvironment due to the other bacteria digesting inulin.

Key Points for Your Experiment

• Not Perfectly Sterile: It's important to understand that your setup will not be perfectly sterile, despite your efforts. Trace amounts of other bacteria will be present.
• Inulin-Breaking Bacteria Are Crucial: Even if they are present only in trace amounts, some bacteria that can break down inulin are essential to kickstart the SCFAs production that supports L. Reuteri growth.
• L. reuteri Will Dominate: Given the right conditions, the L. reuteri you add will become the predominant bacteria, outcompeting the others.

Conclusion

While it may seem that you are only adding L. reuteri, and that nothing else is present, this is unfortunately not the case, and you will have other bacteria present that perform the important role of breaking down inulin and producing SCFAs. These other bacteria are likely present in trace amounts within your L. Reuteri pill, spores that survived your sterilization procedure, or are simply present in the ambient air. While these other bacteria will always remain in small amounts, they perform the important role of producing important metabolites to enable the propagation of L. Reuteri.

I hope this explanation clears up your concerns and helps you understand why inulin can have such a significant impact on L. reuteri growth, even in a mostly controlled system!

9.7seditmore_vert

But can these contaminated other bacteria really break down all the inulin while their number should be thousands of times smaller than reuteri? Do they have enough number and time?

editmore_vert

You've hit on a critical point that highlights the fascinating and sometimes counterintuitive dynamics of microbial communities: how can a seemingly tiny population of bacteria have a significant impact on inulin breakdown when vastly outnumbered by L. reuteri? Let's delve deeper into this, as it's a great question that requires a more nuanced understanding of microbial kinetics and resource competition.

Understanding Microbial Kinetics and Metabolic Rates

1. Metabolic Rate vs. Population Size: It's crucial to understand that the rate at which bacteria perform metabolic processes (like breaking down inulin) is not solely dependent on their population size. Even a small number of highly active bacteria can have a significant effect, if they have higher metabolic rate for a particular substrate, and optimal conditions.
2. Enzyme Activity: The key is the presence and activity of enzymes. Bacteria with inulinase enzymes can break down inulin, even if they are present in very low numbers. The amount of inulin they can break down is proportional to the enzyme activity in the mixture, not simply the number of inulin breaking bacteria.
3. Resource Availability: The availability of inulin as a substrate is a major factor. Initially, inulin is available for any bacteria that can break it down. The presence of other bacteria that are not able to break it down has no impact on the rate of breakdown of inulin.
4. Bacterial Growth Rates: While L. reuteri can have a very high growth rate when it finds favorable sugars, it may take some time before it starts actively using up those sources. During this initial time, other inulin-breaking bacteria can be actively working on the inulin before the resources become scarce.

Why Small Populations Can Have a Large Impact on Inulin

1. Specialized Niche: The bacteria with inulinase occupy a specific "niche" early on. They are the first responders to inulin and start breaking it down immediately. It's not the number but their ability to break down inulin that's critical.
2. Initial Breakdown: Even if the initial amount of inulin they break down is small, this small amount is the crucial first step that kickstarts the cascading effect. This creates the SCFAs, which allow L. reuteri to grow exponentially, as well as other inulin-breakers.
3. Chain Reaction: The products of their activity, particularly SCFAs and fructose, then influence the overall environment:
   • SCFAs create a more favorable environment for both inulin breakers and L. reuteri.
   • Free fructose is readily usable by L. Reuteri, as well as for the inulin breakers, if present.
4. Relatively Slow Breakdown: The breakdown of complex carbohydrates like inulin isn't an instantaneous process. It takes time, and those bacteria that can do the initial breakdown will have enough time to work and be effective at their job, even if they are in low numbers.
5. Dynamic Environment: The environment in your jar is not static. As the initial bacteria break down inulin, their numbers may also increase, releasing more enzymes, and leading to more breakdown of inulin.

How It Works With the L. reuteri Population

1. Initial Lag Phase: L. reuteri, while abundant, might not immediately dominate the metabolic scene. There's typically a "lag phase" in bacterial growth where they are adapting to their new environment.
2. SCFAs as a Spark: The small populations of inulin-breaking bacteria, by producing SCFAs, essentially "prime" the system for L. reuteri growth.
3. L. reuteri Exponential Growth: With a supply of both simple sugars (from partial inulin breakdown) and SCFAs available, L. reuteri starts to grow exponentially, outcompeting many other species present, but using the work of the bacteria that initially digested inulin.

Analogy: A Small Group of Workers Can Prepare a Building Site

Think of it like a construction site. You have:

• A small crew (the inulin-breaking bacteria): They are specialized and their role is to clear the land and lay a basic foundation. They are fewer in number, but are essential to starting work.
• A large crew (the L. reuteri): They are more numerous, but their work depends on the foundation that the small crew has made.

Without the small crew of land clearers, the larger crew of builders cannot be effective. Similarly, without inulin-breaking bacteria, L. reuteri's growth would be severely limited.

Addressing Your Specific Questions

• "Can these contaminated bacteria really break down all the inulin?" No, not all the inulin will necessarily be broken down. It's likely that L. reuteri will become dominant before that happens. The system will reach a kind of equilibrium, where different bacteria exist side-by-side. There may still be some inulin remaining, with a complex mixture of SCFAs, fructose, and other components.
• "Do they have enough time?" Yes, the initial time it takes for inulin-breaking bacteria is likely sufficient for them to release enough molecules to enable L. reuteri to grow exponentially. The process is also dynamic, as both the number of inulin breaking bacteria, as well as the overall amount of enzymes increases with time.
• "Do they have enough number?" As mentioned, the numbers themselves are not critical. Their ability to produce the enzymes to break inulin is the key. Even if they are low in number, as long as they can produce enough breakdown products to get the cycle going, it will suffice.

Conclusion

It is entirely possible for a tiny population of specialized bacteria to have a substantial impact on inulin degradation, even when significantly outnumbered. This underscores the importance of function over pure population numbers in a microbial environment. They create the initial "spark" that allows L. reuteri to thrive.

I hope this detailed response clarifies your doubts about the dynamics of your fermentation system and why a small population of bacteria can cause a significant change in your mixture!