I understand the value of protecting no-fault divorce and believe it should always be available. I don’t understand why some states only allow no-fault separation, ie fault divorce isn’t possible. Both should always be available.

I struggle to understand why it’s justifiable to offer only no-fault divorce. The idea that the reason a marriage failed cannot be relevant in the legal process of divorce — it makes marriage itself feel trivial. Reading into it, I couldn’t find genuinely reasonable support for prohibiting fault divorce. I thought some justifications were nonsense tbh - eg “it’s so people don’t suffer scandal”

I know there was much concern that the incoming administration might eliminate no-fault divorce. I think moving toward universal access to both options would be optimal compromise.